3 Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger Features That Affect Shell-Side Pressure Drop
Leave a Comment
Managing Pressure Drop in Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Design
When designing a shell and tube heat exchanger, one of the most critical considerations is pressure drop. Each heat exchanger has a maximum allowable pressure drop, which is influenced by several factors, including the specific application, the type of fluid, and operating conditions.
The goal of the designer is to approach—but not exceed—the maximum allowable pressure drop. Exceeding this threshold can lead to operational inefficiencies and even equipment damage, as excessive pressure can disrupt flow rates and reduce performance. On the other hand, a pressure drop significantly below the maximum limit may indicate suboptimal fluid velocity, which could also impact heat transfer efficiency.
Typically, pressure drop problems arise when the flow rate is too high, resulting in excessive pressure. In such cases, engineers need to implement effective strategies to control pressure while maintaining process efficiency.
There are several approaches to reduce shell-side pressure drop, all of which are tied to key components in shell and tube heat exchanger design: the shell, the tubes, and the baffles.
Limiting Pressure Drop: Shell Design
The shell is a primary factor in controlling pressure drop. The most commonly used shell design is the E-type shell, which features a single inlet and outlet valve and allows the shell-side fluid to make a single pass. While the E-type shell is widely used, it can sometimes result in a pressure drop that exceeds the allowable limit. In these cases, designers may consider alternative shell types, such as the J-type shell, which incorporates two outlet valves to split the flow and reduce pressure drop.
In some configurations, the J-type shell may be modified to include one outlet valve and two inlet valves, sometimes referred to as the I-type shell. Though less common, this design can also help manage pressure drop by allowing for more balanced flow.
For situations where flow splitting isn’t sufficient to control pressure drop, designers might opt for the X-type shell. Like the E-type, the X-type shell has a single inlet and outlet valve. However, the valves are positioned directly opposite each other, which improves flow distribution and can help reduce pressure drop. X-type shells are typically used in shell-side condensers and gas coolers.
If the shell style must remain unchanged but pressure drop still needs to be controlled, increasing the shell diameter can be an effective strategy. A larger diameter reduces flow velocity by shortening the length of the tubes, which can lower the pressure drop. However, this comes with trade-offs, including increased material costs due to the thicker shell wall and a higher tube count. Additionally, shorter tubes can lower tube-side velocity, potentially reducing heat transfer efficiency.
Limiting Pressure Drop: Tube Configurations
The arrangement of tubes also plays a significant role in managing shell-side pressure drop. For example, tubes arranged in a square pattern can reduce pressure drop and facilitate easier tube cleaning. However, a square arrangement tends to accommodate fewer tubes, which can limit heat transfer capacity.
To balance this, designers may opt for a rotated square (or diamond) tube pattern, which can improve heat transfer by increasing flow turbulence, though it may still lead to a higher pressure drop in some cases.
Tube pitch—the distance between adjacent tubes—also impacts pressure drop. A tighter tube pitch increases the number of tubes within the shell, maximizing heat transfer but also increasing shell-side pressure drop. Conversely, increasing the tube pitch can reduce pressure drop by allowing the fluid to flow more slowly, which can be particularly effective when combined with an X-type shell.
Limiting Pressure Drop: Baffle Design
Baffles, the metal plates that direct the flow of shell-side fluid, are another critical element in pressure drop management. The size, shape, and placement of baffles influence the flow pattern, velocity, and ultimately, the pressure drop.
The most common baffle design is the single segmental baffle, which is nearly a full circle with one-third of the circumference cut away to allow fluid to flow around it. This pattern repeats along the length of the shell. While effective, the single segmental baffle can result in higher-than-desirable pressure drops, especially at high flow rates.
To mitigate this, engineers may opt for a double segmental baffle, where the cutout is centered rather than positioned at the sides. This design divides the flow into two separate streams, helping to lower pressure drop by reducing the flow velocity while still maintaining effective fluid circulation.
Baffles arranged along the tube bundle help direct the flow of shell side fluid.
Limiting Pressure Drop: Baffle Spacing and Cut
The spacing between baffles can be adjusted to control pressure drop. Increasing the gap between baffles allows for greater cross-flow, which reduces the pressure drop. However, there are design limits—baffles must be spaced far enough apart to prevent tube vibration or damage, as they also serve as support for the tube bundle.
Baffle cut, or the percentage of the shell diameter removed from each baffle, also plays a role. A larger baffle cut (i.e., a larger opening) reduces flow resistance, lowering the pressure drop. However, this reduces baffle support, which can compromise tube stability and heat exchanger performance. Designers must strike a balance between reducing pressure drop and ensuring adequate tube support.
Another baffle design option to reduce pressure drop is the no-tubes-in-window design. In this configuration, the baffles do not interact with the tubes, allowing for wider spacing between baffles. While this reduces pressure drop, it limits the space available for tubes, thus reducing heat transfer capacity.
Finding the Optimal Solution
Reducing pressure drop in a shell and tube heat exchanger requires a careful balance of design factors, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Each design decision—from shell type to tube arrangement to baffle placement—impacts pressure drop, flow rates, and heat transfer efficiency. Experienced engineers understand how to navigate these trade-offs to meet the specific needs of your operation.
At Enerquip, we specialize in designing and manufacturing shell and tube heat exchangers that optimize performance, including managing pressure drop. Our team can work with you to create a solution tailored to your requirements. Ready to discuss your project? Request a quote today!
More from the Enerquip Blog
- Duplex Stainless Steel Makes an Excellent Choice for Manufacturers
- Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers: A Guide to Industry Standards
- Plastic Pyrolysis: Transforming Waste into Resources
- Selecting Tube Sizing in a Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
- Maximizing Heat Exchanger Efficiency with Impingement Devices